Great, my RS151 has arrived! Experience and suggestions


The overall workmanship of RS151 is great, and the appearance is also very beautiful. The only drawback is that the cutting edge of the top plate is very sharp.

The initial listening of the new device has delicate and transparent sound quality, good extension at both ends, sharp dynamics, and full low-frequency elasticity. Of course, I hope the sound can become smoother and more natural after ‘Run in’.

There is a regret in terms of the hardware interface of the body, as it lacks an extremely important output port in the network era: SFP (Small Form Pluggables). SFP ports transmit digital audio through optical fibers or electrical signals, and their core advantage lies in reducing electromagnetic interference and signal attenuation. It can isolate high-frequency interference from switches and front-end network devices. If using ROON core machine with RS151 as a bridge, the existence of SFP ports is very necessary.

Next, let’s talk about the software control of iPad APP. The overall experience is that the operation is quite cumbersome, not intuitive and user-friendly enough. My current main playback source is a 3.5-inch 8T mechanical hard drive with USB external linear power supply. My previous digital broadcast was LUMIN U2MINI, and its app controls were very simple and intuitive, with extremely convenient song selection. HIFI ROSE should learn this well. The RS151 song selection lacks the extremely important icon based folder selection method. To accurately find the music files I need, I can only use the folder exploration list file selection method, which cannot see the album cover and affects the intuitiveness of song selection. Although RS151 has multiple album cover selection interfaces, the logic is confusing and it is extremely difficult to quickly find specific songs. (Without using the search function) Although there are horizontally scrollable music folder names on the music folder interface that can be directly clicked, it does not support multiple layers of folders. I mixed all the songs and albums that I had originally classified together, and some even split one album into two albums.

Key points:
1: We need a concise and clear icon based folder selection interface like the LUMIN system.
2: We need a more user-friendly playback control interface. Currently, the playback control interface consists of a huge album cover in the upper left half, song progress and control buttons in the lower half, and file information on the right side. And the song list can only be seen by clicking on the right sidebar. There is a bug here. The currently playing songs in the song queue on the right are highlighted, but clicking on other songs in the list can successfully select songs, but the songs will not be highlighted. You must close and reopen the right sidebar to see the song being played highlighted.

The UI for this interface is recommended to be designed as follows: the upper left half displays various information about small album covers and songs, audio formats, paths, etc. The lower half still includes music progress and control buttons. The right side is used to display the song list of the album, supporting operations such as clicking and switching, and supporting scrolling up and down of the list. Cancel the sidebar on the right.Of course, the left and right areas can also be interchanged to see which layout is easiest to manipulate.

There are two more points. Firstly, I hope to be able to zoom in and out of the entire album icon interface in the icon based folder selection interface, similar to the LUMIN system. 2: Long press a certain album icon to pop up the album playback mode, instead of needing to click on the album cover and then select the button to choose the playback mode.

Finally, I sincerely hope that HIFI ROSE will continue to improve. I really like the appearance design and sound quality of RS151. What we urgently need to improve is a more concise, intuitive, and user-friendly operating experience.

6 Likes

I have another question. I opened the SMB option on RS151 and set my username and password. I entered the IP address of RS151 in the browser on my desktop computer, but it showed that I couldn’t connect. I am also unable to connect on another laptop, but the local network device name icon of RS151 can be displayed in my computer network, but double clicking the icon only shows the properties. Both computers are within the same local area network.

I understand now\ \The IP address is the search box I enter when opening my computer, not the browser. Now it can be connected correctly.

1 Like

First ignore Boris… sorry Boris but you’re 100% negative and should just sell your kit and move on.

Your point about the software is correct. The UX is not the greatest, but its also not the worst.
Once you get used to it… its ok.

Hello, this is HiFi ROSE.

We do not wish to interfere with the free and open discussions within the community.
Every topic can have both positive and negative opinions, and that is completely acceptable.

However, direct personal attacks or abusive comments toward others are not helpful to anyone.
We kindly ask that you refrain from mocking or insulting other members.

If someone repeatedly posts messages that intentionally provoke, insult, or hurt others,
their posting privileges may be restricted.
Posts that clearly cross the line may be removed at our discretion.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

4 Likes

RETURN IT ASAP!! This company is a hoax!! I returned mine and got the McIntosh DS200. Sooooo much better and when you need help… you call customer support and speak to a live, human based in New York… :slight_smile:

Hier wird soviel auf die Firma Rose draufgehauen, für was ?
Die Geräte sind gut, die Software funktioniert, wenn auch nicht immer reibungslos aber sie tut es.
Ich hatte zwei Rosé Geräte und beide machten keine Probleme.
Rs 250a und den 151 der bei mir einwandfrei funktioniert.

Schaut euch mal die anderen Hersteller an , glaubt ihr da funktioniert alles reibungslos :joy:
Bluesound, Nad die zb seit Jahren Versprechungen machen und die schaffen es auch nicht auch nur ansatzweise ihre Geräte einwandfrei zu updaten.
Will hier keine Firma schlecht reden aber die kochen alle nur mit Wasser.

get a grip, and leave this forum. If you don’t own hifi rose now why are you still here?

1 Like

Geoff: Ive sadly and unfortunately have owned it. Regardless, there is no rule stating one must be a current owner of any hifi rose device. Second, I have every right to share my experience as a customer, and what I’ve experienced with this brand… Take a step back and think next time, before jumping the gun… :wink:

1 Like

I certainly can agree with you @dbra1 Yes, all brands make mistakes… It’s in how they treat and handle the mistake that I am addressing here. With that said, no brand treats people as awful as what I witnessed… and experienced with this HiFi Rose brand. I am simply sharing my experience. nothing more. and nothing less. So that others are not surprised when they experience the same terrible service that I did.

bless :wink:
look forward to your negativity in the future then :wink:

While there is no rule and @ROSEHAN has commented that they don’t like to censor posts…

If you’re not a member of the community … your post is just merely sour grapes.

Its one thing if you own it and have issues… or want to see changes… its another if you’re just spouting noise.

not even close comparable, RS151 is so much more… DS2000 feels hollow and cheap, a big empty metal box, the number of features packed into RS151 are so much more that is not even a question to compare.

The DS200 weighs in at 20.5 lbs (hardly a lightweight) and the RS151 at 24.3 lbs. Sure I like the feel of a weighty piece, but I hardly think that is the way to judge a component. I am sure the difference in weight can be attributed to the thick piece of aluminum that Rose uses for the top of the unit. I am not going to give you any argument about the purported features of the Rose or the appearance, which it wins hands down. As for the sound, well, personal preference. But if one works reliably and the other doesn’t, there really isn’t any contest is there?