New RA280 Review

While this is a review for the RA280… which has been around for a while, its a new review out of Portugal. (In English) You can see the video HERE

Its a pretty good review overall albeit the conversation is a bit dated for 2026.

One topic was the speed that GaN offers.
This is why the amp pairs nicely to my Mon Mini s and why it would pair nice to speakers that have AMT drivers and ‘fast’ mids and subwoofers.

While he described the look as ‘retro’ IMHO I think is a pull back from the RA180 which was a bit over the top and not to everyone’s taste.

The point is that Rose does listen and it looks like they are reaching out more to better market their products outside of Korea.

:yawning_face:

Significant Difference Between a Well-Made Class D Amplifier and a GaN-FET Amplifier!

No, you won’t hear a significant difference between a GaN-FET amplifier and a sophisticated, classically designed silicon Class D amplifier in a direct blind test! My skepticism regarding psychoacoustics is entirely justified. Many reports on the internet are based on the classic “buyer bias” (those who spend more money hear more). Looking at the topic purely from a technical and sonically neutral perspective, it can be summarized as follows:
Why there is no audible difference. Both are already “perfect” in terms of measurements: Modern, well-designed silicon Class D amplifiers (like modules from Hypex NCORE/EVAL or Purifi Eigentakt) already reduce distortion (THD+N) and noise so far below the human hearing threshold that they sound absolutely transparent. While a GaN FET can technically reduce these values ​​even further, our hearing cannot distinguish between “inaudibly distorted” and “even more inaudibly distorted.” The switching frequency is too high anyway:

GaN transistors switch at approximately 400 kHz to 800 kHz. A well-designed classic Class-D amplifier also switches well above the human hearing range (up to 20 kHz). The output filter smooths this signal into a clean analog waveform in both systems.

So why do manufacturers use GaN at all?

The advantage of GaN lies primarily at the engineering level, not in the soundstage:

Simpler circuit design: Because GaN transistors have no reverse recovery charge, they inherently generate fewer switching errors. Developers need to use fewer workarounds (e.g., complex negative feedback loops) to obtain a clean signal.

Even less heat:
GaN operates extremely efficiently. You can pack an enormous amount of power into the smallest space without the chassis getting hot.

The bottom line:

If you already own a well-made Class-D amplifier (for example, with Purifi or newer Hypex modules), switching to a GaN amplifier won’t offer any real sonic improvement.

The “GaN sound” in this direct comparison is primarily excellent marketing.

The sound of both systems is largely determined by the quality of the input stage (op-amps) and the stability of the power supply, not by the transistor material.

Who told you that a thousand times???

Boris and I. But keep living in your YouTube matrix and believe everything you read on YouTube from supposed “experts.” :laughing:

You in connection with social media (like YouTube):

In network culture, such people are often referred to as “armchair psychologists,” “hobby experts,” or “internet theorists.”

This means they acquire half the knowledge they read or see in videos and act as if they’re all there is to it. When they try to distort other people’s reality or manipulatively impose their own views, psychology sometimes refers to this as gaslighting, a milder form of invalid communication.

:arrow_up: Who kept posting this?

Boris, who wanted to open your eyes.

Cheers

Bonte, there you go again.
Free clue, you can hear a difference between class D amps.

I tried a Douk Audio A5 Pro vs the Rose.
Yes there was a difference.

And then there’s the ARCAM SOLO UNO vs Rose.
Here tested using an RCA in source. (Bypass the DAC)

Again a difference in sound.

So please give it a rest.

Yes and no. Possibly, Bonte meant three identical amplifiers, for example from the same manufacturer, ideally the same model and built in the same way, but with three different circuit designs inside: Hypex, Purifi and GaN. In that case, hearing a difference may be impossible, just as with many other amplifiers.

But if the models are different, the difference can be so striking that even a Chukchi from the tundra would hear it.

That was the case with my Marantz PM-10 and Marantz Model 10. The PM-10 reproduced sound very sharply, with insane dynamics, and it always made you want to turn the volume up a little. It had very weak microdynamics. It did not get warm and barely consumed any electricity.

The Model 10, on the other hand, has much softer transients, absolutely crazy microdynamics, sounds almost tube-like, gets hot like mad, and consumes four times more power than its older brother.

When I first started comparing them at home, I thought the PM-10 was faulty, but the second one behaved exactly the same. I had two of them and used them as power amplifiers.

So that is how it was. And yet some people listen to them and like them. The sound was completely different.

:rofl: :joy: :sweat_smile: :man_facepalming:t2: 20 characters

Hi VIK,

That’s exactly what I meant!
I knew it. VIK, you don’t just watch YouTube videos with avoidable experts.

And otherwise?
How are things with you? Health-wise, family-wise, and musically?

Best regards,
Tom…:v:t2:

@Bonte , @VIK

The only person talking about identical amplifiers is you.

You can have amps based on the same chip and depending on the circuit, they can sound different.

Not all GaNFET amps sound the same. Depending on the circuit and yes, including the op-amps they will sound differently. BTW, remember that Amir from ASR claims that all op amps sound the same because they test nearly the same.

So what exactly is your beef?

VIK

In my opinion, the Marantz PM10 is a weak device, quite loud in both the upper midrange and vocals, and lacking dynamics. It’s an amplifier that can only handle highly efficient speakers. All high-end speakers from manufacturers like Sonus Faber, Dunaudio, B&W, etc., were unable to cope, and I couldn’t understand how, on paper, this amplifier could deliver 2x400W into 4 ohms.

The 10, on the other hand, is a much better device, but considering the price, I would also choose other devices from companies like Accuphase, Esoteric, or Mac. Firstly, they’re better quality, and secondly, they’re less expensive to sell than the Marantz.

Blah blah blah…and more blah, blah, blah.

You’re a real know-it-all!

But that’s what happens when they acquire half-baked knowledge from videos and act like they know everything. When they try to distort other people’s reality or manipulatively impose their own views, psychology sometimes refers to this as “gaslighting” or—in a milder form—“invalidating communication.”

It would be much better for you to take a closer look at your own psyche instead of constantly rambling on about gan-fets and external clocks. You always want to be right, so there’s no way to reach a consensus with you; on the contrary, you only cause dissent!

And since I’m a tolerant person, I’m ending this conversation,
according to the motto:

The wiser and more tolerant person gives in!

Cheers

@Cougar2025
The loudspeakers you listed would never have played particularly well with the PM-10 in the first place, simply because of its inherent brightness in the upper midrange and treble area.

In my system, the PM-10 worked reasonably well with the Epicon 8, but there was never any real synergy.

Regarding the Model 10: yes, I actually went through a very long selection process back then. I listened to the Accuphase E-5000, but with the Epikores it sounded too soft, woolly and stretched out. And considering that it costs roughly the same, plus that 1970s design, I simply cannot look at it.

I also listened to the Esoteric F-02, and it was very good. But at that time there was no possibility to trade in my power amplifiers, and its original price was significantly higher than the Model 10. The F-02 is a great amplifier, no doubt.

But in the end, all of this is more or less dancing around the same arena.

The best integrated amplifier, in my opinion, is the Gryphon Diablo 333. But the price is insane, and I also have no realistic way to place it properly in my setup.

VIK

When it comes to looks, it’s obviously a matter of taste. I love the look of Accuphase, and their sound is brilliant. I also tested the Esoterica you mentioned, as well as the Gryphon Diablo 300, and of all the ones I’ve owned, I liked the Gryphon the least. The Gryphon 333 is outrageously priced and doesn’t sell very well here; they simply overpriced it. For me, the Accuphase E 800 and DP 570 cd won, and so far I’m very happy. The Accuphase is connected to the Sonus Faber Serafino Tradition, and I’m just enjoying the music. The Rose RS 151 also plays a role.

You wrote:

If you already own a well-made Class-D amplifier (for example, with Purifi or newer Hypex modules), switching to a GaN amplifier won’t offer any real sonic improvement.

The reality is that there will be a sonic difference. What you prefer will be your taste.

I currently have the Arcam Solo Uno which is a very simple AIO that is based around an Infineon Class D chip and IIRC a CS DAC. A very clean and good sound, albeit only 25wpc @8 ohms. 50wpc @4 ohms.

Totally different from the RS520 when using the same source and bypassing the DAC.

Others here have talked about different experiences and synergy of their class D amps.