How it is possible to have on my car( a vw…) and not on my rose?
You have to do something about this…
Because car play uses your phone to provide lossless.
If you’ve never ran a team or an LoB you wouldn’t understand that Rose has to set their priorities.
There are more pressing issues than getting Spotify to play ‘lossless’ even though its not truly lossless.
Look at the other topics on this site. Now if you were Rose, what would your priorities be?
Provide the best for their customers
Whatever the customer!
And… as it is possible for Tidal… I think it is more about licensing…
I understand… but in the larger scheme of things…
Where does spotify lossless rank in the issues that Rose has to deal with?
Be honest.
If there were no other issues and Rose just said nope, not going to do it… that would be one thing.
Dealing w both hardware and software issues… a bit larger don’t you think?
For me… as Tidal is pretending to be lossless…. and as I can see that only part is …MAX….and we know that it is not true…I would like to see how Spotify is doing… on my Rose.
Maybe they are better… in my car it sounds better than Tidal…
And for the price of Rose… common…it is not something that I bought form….they suppose to be in high class Hi Fi…
They can… I have trust in them!
And I love my Rose!
I will tell you that playing spotify thru an external BT transceiver (Only BT 5.0) instead of the BT 4.2 via Rose (I have an RS520) You can hear the difference. I go from the transceiver to the Rose via TOSLINK
I would imagine if I had BT 5.4 sources and a BT 5.4 transceiver it would sound better.
I like my Rose… warts and all.
It’s only what… the most popular streaming service in the world?
It’s quite lossless. So is Spotify Losssless. If you subscribe to a cheaper plan, it’s not really a Tidal problem, is it?
If you knew jack about anything you would know that this is based on codecs supported on both ends of the connection, and not BT version, but then you do not know jack.
Bandwidth costs money. Pay less, get a cheaper service. Pay more, get a more expensive service. Does not seem too complicated.
Boris, you yet again show yourself to be a troll.
If you were actually following the thread, you would have understood that I was talking about Rose setting up a priority list of things to fix. (Which if you look at other threads, they are doing.)
While the Rose can and does play spotify thru spotify connect, it only doesn’t do lossless yet.
Compared to other issues that they are tackling… this is a lower priority. Not to mention that if there were a problem w the Spotify connect, you can still use BT, or Airplay to play spotify from your PC or phone to the Rose device. (I’ve tested this including using a MB20 transceiver connected to my RS520)
It is apparent you’ve never ran a LoB or even a team of developers supporting production app(s).
And if you could read… I clearly stated BT sources to the transceiver because BT is backwards compatible so that if you have an earlier release of BT for the source, you may not get lossless depending on the version of the source’s BT.
So please go hang out at ASR w Amir’s cult.
BTW unless you’re using a phone’s data plan, its not the bandwidth but the total amount of data consumed. W internet providers to the home (telco or cable provider) you have set bandwidth rates which are more than capable of handling lossless unless they cap your usage and throttle you. Not sure of any still doing that either here in the US/Canada or in Europe. YMMV
Uh huh. Like doing some basic quality control. We’ve heard all that before, long before you’ve managed to find a discounted 520 somewhere.
Only. Funny how e.g. Lenbrook could get BluOS doing it just fine, even on cheap Nodes and Pulses that aren’t even being produced anymore, and on decidedly ancient Linux. Not Rose though.
Sure. Why would one need the fancy big-screened Rose then?
Lots of wrong things are apparent to stupid people. As anything else you say, they are wrong though.
Yeah, yeah, you don’t know how Bluetooth works either. Not exactly surprising.
And as usual, Smegmel the stupid has no idea what he’s talking about. It has nothing to do with your personal bandwidth (unless you are trying to stream DSD for some odd reason, anything better than a classic modem that goers “beepbeepbloop” can handle any highres format being streamed). It’s costs to the service. Egress costs money. Not that you’d know what it is.
And Boris you continue to go off topic and continue to show your ignorance.
Like I said… you’ve never supported any sort of production environment where you had to lead a team and prioritize your work flow.
If you can’t add anything of value… you continue to prove that you’re a troll and should be banned.
LOL.
Keep showing that you have no idea what you are talking about. But then, if you tried to only speak about something you know even a little bit, you’d be quiet forever…
Boris.
Again, you’re not adding any value.
I’ve been IT for over 40yrs working in multiple roles from software development, R&D, and also in management for two global fortune 100 companies.
(Including oversight of one company’s APAC business.)
So yeah… I know what I am talking about.
What exactly have you done?
Mopping floors around a semi-broken mainframe 30 years ago isn’t quite the experience oyu think it is.
And, just like standardmoron and a few others, you demonstrate that you have no idea what you are talking about every time you post something, anything, here. Like having no clue where bandwidth costs are.