Huff reviewed it. While he is one of those online talking heads, he kind of made it seem like while the T8 was a tremendous sound (and feature) value for the dollar, it maybe wasn’t quite as good sonically as the RS130. He did however make slight acknowledgment to the Eversolo app being better than the Rose app. All in a very vague way, though. If he were to out and out say something truly negative about a product, his career as a talking head would soon be over.
Right, I saw the review and of course there are others. Yet they haven’t reviewed the HiFI Rose.
As far as I know Huff is the only one who’s reviewed both.
I watched his review. He makes the point that most of the difference in sound quality you will hear when comparing the 130 to the T8 (and any digital transport) will come from the DAC that it is connected to. The subtle, if any, sonic differences in the transports would likely not be noticed by me and my older ears. That said, I don’t have any regrets in my decision making process when purchasing the 130, it is only after I purchased it and lived with it that I regretted the purchase.
By the way, Huff spends a lot of time saying nothing IMO.
I agree with you about Huff.
He loves to pontificate as to many of the reviewers do.
I don’t regret my purchases.
Although I bought a set of Mon Acoustic Mini s that I love… yet after repainting and upgrading my older Vienna Acoustic Haydn s, they now rival the Mini s. The other bonus… The RS520 and mini s are in my office. My old system is in the living room so my wife doesn’t use the TV and sound bar to play music from spotify.
Yep. He’s good at that.
Or anyone else, because there aren’t any. Also, like any other youboob reviewer, Huff is a prostituting idiot.
For $600/pair they would be moderately good speakers. As long as you only listen to audiophile-approved single track of Diana Krall drivel on repeat. Which sounds about right for someone as deaf and dumb as you are.
Boris you clearly don’t know jack about anything.
Why don’t you hang out on ASR amongst your own kind?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Ah Boris that would be you.
Being tone deaf and clueless.
Again, perhaps you should hang out on ASR.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Blah blah blah…woof woof woof… 
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Blah blah blah…woof woof woof… …DogrisM
Just ignore Boris.
He’s mad because I showed him that you can buy CAT 7 cables w RJ45 connectors from either Amazon or MicroCenter. (I guess I should have used NewEgg instead?)
The purpose of this thread is to make suggestions to @ROSEHAN for consideration to improve the products.
Boris seems to hate the products.
Most of us here are critical because we know w a few tweaks it can be better.
Good doggie. Now shut your trap when humans are talking, or off to the pound with you.
Nobody expects Tom Turd to talk like a human. Because Tom Turd ain’t one.
Thanks. I already blocked him. But this time I find it amused to describe his constant barkings and ignorance…blah blah blah…that’s what he is. He is a joke of this forum.
What you say is correct.
Of course there are CAT 7 cables!
But the connectors “only” meet the CAT 6a standard. This makes the connector the bottleneck. A pure CAT 7 cable has a different connector that is rarely (or never) used in commercial applications, because most network devices are equipped with RJ45 connectors.
@BorisM is once again right with his statements.
Just a random link from the internet, and there are thousands of similar posts on this topic.
Those who can read have a clear advantage…!
So the CAT 7 was a bit of a weird one. Sort of an interim step that upped the speed to 10Gb/s.
And no, he’s not.
You can buy CAT 7 w RJ45 but now its a moot point because you have CAT 8 which is the fastest speed you can get w an RJ45 and copper.
I guess none of you have ever had to deal w a standards committee.
Yes, I also only have CAT 8 cables in my small home network.
If they can achieve CAT 7 speeds with a (CAT 6a connector or lower) pre-terminated (supposedly CAT 7 or CAT 8 cable), aliens would have to come along or they’d have been underground for a long time.
That’s what @BorisM meant when he repeatedly posted:
There are no commercially available pure CAT 7 cables, and if there are, it only says so because the cable is CAT 7, but the RJ45 connector is CAT 6a or lower. It’s just splitting hairs, and CAT 6a has the same speeds.
But it’s still fraudulent to call (sell) a pre-terminated CAT 7 cable a CAT 7 cable when the RJ45 connectors aren’t CAT 7 connectors!
If you buy a CAT 7 cable, or if it’s advertised as such, it’s customer deception, and you’re probably buying a CAT 5, 6, or 6a cable because of the connectors.
That’s how I understood Boris’s post. Buy CAT 8 if you always want the best and fastest, and everything will be fine.
Even a CAT 5 cable would be perfectly sufficient for HD streaming. Even if it’s DXD (Digital eXtreme Definition).
Do you need to move massive amounts of data back and forth quickly within your home network?
If so, a CAT 6a is perfectly sufficient for a 10 Gbps home network, as it supports this speed over a distance of up to 100 meters and offers a bandwidth of 500 MHz. However, they require shielded network cables and accessories to reduce crosstalk and improve data transmission.
Since CAT 8 isn’t expensive anymore, you might as well just buy CAT 8. But as you said, I’ll never experience even CAT 8 speeds here in stupid Germany. We’re still lagging behind African countries when it comes to internet. Spain and Switzerland (10 Gbps XGS-PON) are already in operation.