Sebrof,
While you are certainly free to quibble with the use of the word crippled I think you would have to agree that there is a great disparity between the quality of the Hifi Rose hardware and component design versus the user software (RoseConnect). I have, however acknowledged that the RoseConnect software is stable and it is.
As I have said, it comes so close. Where are the problems? DLNA is only functional as an end point speaker. Most free DLNA programs find and catalog all music files on the same network and allow a user to select and play songs directly. Not RoseConnect.
RoseConnect won’t go out on its connected network and catalog, log into and play music stored on other drives. You have to specify the exact path and even then it’s quirky.
RoseConnect will not let a user organize his/her preferences for most menu items. I’d like my preferences to be first and the ability to include or exclude lists from others. RoseTube won’t let me put my selections on the opening page. I see things like K-Pop that are displayed first and I can’t get rid of them.
The user defined radio stations won’t permit station favicons.
RoseConnect won’t permit a user to simply click on a song in the Queue and play it (other than the first one). The Queue can’t be modified, only reversed or deleted. The decision trees are often illogical. I could go on and on but you get the idea. I can go all the way down to Korean Language characters in the English version and misspelled words. There are issues not only with the current features but look at the frequency of upgrades and paucity of new features implemented. Finally, show me the RoseConnect user manual. There isn’t one. Take a hard look at a sub $1,000 streamer like EverSolo and compare their software to RoseConnect. Eversolo wins. All that said, I am an owner and supporter of HiFi Rose. I want it to improve and to be the best. I’m hanging in there hoping the user software will at some point equal the quality of the hardware and the sound/video.
StandardModel