[OTA] SW Ver 4.15.12 Software Release ( RS130/RS520/RS150/RS250/RS201 )

BorisM,

You are right, of course. Other consumer streamer manufacturers have problems too. I am probably guilty of that old adage that the perfect is the enemy of the good in my comments.

I’ve subscribed to the other streaming companies’ user forums just to see how they compare. There are problems for sure but not nearly the volume or lack of responsive corrections as are on the Hifi Rose user forum. You are right about Linn and Naim, the old school British traditional streamers. However, they are going to be relics just like British automobiles. The issue for me is that the Western world has to compete with the Eastern World. The better Chinese developers know what quality control is. In the space of one year Eversolo has come from nowhere to near parity with HiFi Rose at half the price. They have had plenty of problems BUT they have addressed them instantly.
My issue is not with where they are now but it is the inability to see and deal with the road ahead, specifically not with the old school competition but what is here now from the East.

Rose has a superb hardware product but it will be eaten by the East unless it ups its game in software. Look at my issues concerning DLNA functionality. I’ve been asking for answers about how Rose’s DLNA works (or doesn’t) for weeks with no response. Simple freeware does a better job.

I’m a fan boy. I chose HiFi Rose. I think it’s beautiful. I want it to succeed. However, it’s also frustrating, akin to trying to make a wife out of a mistress.

I think we both can see what will happen to the brand if it doesn’t pick up the pace. I don’t want that to happen. I want Hi Fi Rose to prosper.

StandardModel

1 Like

I agree in a sense, although I am not sure if people buying linns and naims would ever be buying eversolos, no matter how much objectively better the latter might be.

Rose’s software is below average in quality, but it is not a total outlier in the HiFi world.

For what it’s worth, Rose appears to be running Cling mediarenderer…

BorisM,

Cling is fine. It has the necessary ability to do what I am requesting ( and what every free DLNA out there can do).
With Cling, you can build a media renderer that can discover and connect to DLNA-compliant media servers, browse their media libraries, select songs, and play them on the Rose renderer device. Cling provides the necessary APIs and protocols to implement these features, making it a suitable choice for creating DLNA-compatible applications and devices.
So what happened?

For snob purposes alone you are correct that a lot of people wouldn’t buy the Chinese version even if they gave it away.

StandardModel

Yeah, there are people who believe that nothing under $10K could possibly sound good.

With a trial version of JRiver (although the old Windows Media Player works, too) I can see that Rose has a DLNA media server (if you have any files stored in the Rose) and a renderer. I was able to play to Rose from JRiver, and you can control playback from the front panel. There does not seem to be a way to browse external servers though…

Boris,

You know more about this than I do. I thought Rose only served as a renderer and not as a server. I can connect via UpNP between the RS 130 and the Audirvāna running on Windows as a server. What I can’t get is the ability for Rose to “see” and “run” the music files via DLNA in Audirvāna on Windows.

What am I doing wrong?

StandardModel

It appears to be a server, at least my 250 does appear as such to Windows Media Player, VLC, JRiver.

I did not see a way to browse an external DLNA server from it, but then Rose does not include a Roon remote either. You can play/pause/move to next track, which might be all there is.

It would be good to see an official confirmation though.

I’m running the beta version of the HiFi Rose Operating system and if there are improvements in this area, I can’t find them. Have you seen of any plans to enable the full abilities of DLNA on the HiFi Rose line?

Are there any other improvements in the beta software?

The remote pairing has been vastly improved. The beta software feels as if it has had an overall stability increase. It seems much more stable than the current version. File transfer seems easier and quicker. I have been critical of Rose but they appear to have done a very good job here so complements are due.

No DLNA improvements. I’m looking for others and will let you know.

1 Like

How did you get this beta firmware if I may ask?
Or is it just the app software?

On the device, where you can check your firmware version, there’s a button to join beta…

I’d like to second the comment regarding the BT. I have found that it is linking better with my RS250, responding very well when you use the BT controller, no skipping or scrolling none stop. Press a button and it responds. I am not using a Beta version as far as I am aware, so well done Rose we are starting to see some positivity. Hopefully this will continue and not take a backward step with future SW updates. Let’s hope this progress continues again through other areas of concern that your users are raising on this forum.

Found it :slight_smile:
Won’t do it, because it gives a warning a factory reset will be done
Just wait for the official version

While that warning is ominous, that is not what is happening to me. My settings have been retained.

I’ll wait for official version and some positive comments, I hope.

Probably a good decision.

1 Like

Thanks for the reporting on the beta.

Can you go back to the official release after trying the beta?

Absolutely. Yes, you can go back. I’ve done it several times.

1 Like

Maybe it’s not available in my region. When I click update to the early access version it says the current version is the latest. But I’m running the official version.