Can it get any more expensive???
I have speakers from Temu for $20 and they’re great.
Poor baby, couldn’t afford those either?
And yes, they are still better than anything from Raidho.
You should also lay off mind-altering substances. They are both illegal and make you appear even more clueless than someone who buys anything from Mootek.
1 Like
They would be fine if you weren’t calling them subwoofers. They are not.
And that really tells you everything you need to know. Which is – don’t buy Mon speakers.
It is quite telling, where you get your product advice from. Maybe you should also check Wal*Mart flyers, too.
1 Like
“Belief” is when some random idiot somewhere thinks that an external clock does anything in a home audio system. Or that a DACless streamer has a sound. I only deal in facts.
Sorry, but those little cubes you got from Costco are not Blades. Not even a budget version of Blades.
And you are wrong again. But then, you have not been right, at least on this forum, ever.
It might surprise you (but then developmentally challenged kids are easily amused) but there are these places called “stores” and as long as one does not look like they need a diaper change (here’s where you fail) one can go and listen to speakers. Odd but true.
You would also look a but better (not by much, but beggars can’t be choosers, and with IQ in low double-digits you’re certainly in no position to choose) if you did not talk to yourself.
Boris, the idiot that thinks he knows everything from listening at stores. LOL
Nope, exactly because I do the research before I buy stuff. Although I sort of do regret buying the Roses – not so much even because the software is crap, but because it seems to attract a disconcertingly high proportion of not just stupid people, but of obnoxiously stupid people who think that owning a decidedly midmarket and quite inexpensive device puts them into some sort of high-end company.
No person whose hearing is not completely shot would get anything as bad as Raidho after owning a KEF.
1 Like
You never answered my question, are those $90.00 Missions the same model as your speakers ? Please answer dum dum
I know reading isn’t your strong point but I have kef meta blade 2 currently dum dum for the 100th time. But only a guy who makes all his comparisons at stores where they are sick of seeing your freeloading bum and shooing you out after 20 seconds, would make such an idiotic assumption. Uh hum… BORIS. "Please let me listen a longer " then goes home and buys used Missions , only a total knob would do that LOL. Dont you know store owners have to make a living too ? Freeloaders like you are harming the dealer. But in all reality , it’s all good, dont get angry Boris, we can be friends . Here’s an olive branch , do you accept ?
They are not, but comprehending that is well above and beyond your abilities.
Sorry, but those little wireless things form Costco, while quite decent, are very much NOT Blades. Not even the budget version of Blades that ytou were allowed to look at one time.
Have you ever made any other kind?
Yup. So most are more than happy to lug a pair I selected during the store audition to my place for a while.
Of course if we are talking about Raidhos, anyone whose hearing actually works would not need any more than 20 seconds to move on.
I’ve never had any friends with IQ below 50 before (not that there were anything wrong with it, of course!) and I really like to keep it that way.
1 Like
@BorisM If were not going to be friends, and the store owners kicked you out for being a freeloading bum, are we going to go to the garage sales and look for more Missions at $90.00 ? Or did your mom bump up your allowance to $110? Call me when you’re ready to go out dummy. You still never kept your promise of sending me the Mission speaker pair
1 Like
Your obsession with that $90 pair that you’ve imagined is telling.
One day you may be able to get them.
And send me your address. When you get your hearing aid fixed, you’d be amazed how bad your Craphos sound.
@BorisM BORIS FOR THE 101ST TIME IM USING KEF META BLADE 2 . GEEZ your skull is thicker than heavy mud in a Louisiana swamp . dummy ! Those $90.00 speakers must have done a number on your brain.
And there you have it.
Boris again talking out his arse.
Boris you are the only person who claims that RELs are not Subs.
Also you don’t seem to understand the meaning of a fast Sub.
Please stop while you are behind.
1 Like
Yes, he does it purposely to troll. He loves the attention .
1 Like
Your persona here says lots of things. Not a single one of them is correct. So there is absolutely no reason to suspect that this one is any more true than the rest.
You should stick to spouting drivel about “digital to optical conversion.” After all, if you want to remove any doubt about your own intelligence, or lack thereof, who’s gonna stop you?
This is a common, well-known, factual statement from anyone who knows what a subwoofer is.
No, sure, even a REL is likely to improve the sound you get from your Mons – since they were also designed by audiophiles, they totally fail at anything other than being used, by themselves, as rear surround channels. I am sure they are pretty decent at that.
Because it is meaningless. Like dry water and gaping heights.
In RELs defense though, they are fast – they only reproduce fast, high frequencies. Unfortunately, the purpose of a subwoofer is to reproduce (s)low frequencies accurately, so they fail. Just like you when you talk about anything.
1 Like
Don’t listen to this guy, he’s living in mom’s basement pretending to be an audiophile
“Audiophile” is just a less polite way of saying “drooling idiot.” You can call yourself an audiophile all you want.
1 Like
Thanks dum dum. But Noone ask you idiot
We all know you by now.
1 Like